UPDATED Mayor’s Message 2/15/19 – Update on Belmont Park  – – Concerns About Over-Development are Growing and the Deadline for Comments is Extended to March 1st

UPDATE February 15, 2019

Today we received the attached letter from Nassau County Presiding Officer Richard Nicollelo and Nassau County Legislator Vincent Muscarella supporting the Village’s request to Nassau County Executive Laura Curran to direct the Nassau County Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering to complete a full and independent traffic analysis of the Belmont Park Redevelopment Project.  A copy of this letter can be viewed here: Ltr to Executive Curran. We also received today Presiding Officer Nicolello and Legislator Muscarella’s  written comments to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Belmont Project. A copy of that document can be viewed here: Ltr to ESD.” Also, County Executive Curran sent the attached letter acknowledging the 1700 of  your letters we sent and the Village’s request that the ESD’s Belmont Project should be reviewed by the Nassau County Planning Commission. Ltr From Executive Curran 


Since the conclusion of the Hearings on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Belmont Project, a significant amount has happened.

First, it seems the more this Project is studied, the more concerns about the wide-ranging negative impacts and the lack of real proposals by ESD to offset the negative impacts are becoming apparent to many others outside the Village of Floral Park.

The Nassau County Village Officials Association (NCVOA) recently passed a resolution stating that any approval of the Belmont Project must be conditioned on the requirement of a full-time station at Belmont and that the “developer be required to bear and pay all costs associated with the upgrade of the station, without the expenditure of public resources (tax revenue, bond proceeds or otherwise) to rebuild said station”. NCVOA Resolution

I want to thank the NCVOA for taking a close look at the proposal.  As is apparent from their resolution, it is clear that they believe that this Project as proposed, without any concrete infrastructure improvements, will have negative effects throughout Nassau County and especially western Nassau County.

Similarly, just to the west of us, in New York City, the New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer cited the paucity of analysis of the traffic impacts on the Queens side of this project in his request for the New York City Department of Transportation to undertake a study of the impacts of the proposed Project on the residents of Queens.  The NYC DOT recently announced that, given the concerns raised by Comptroller Stringer and other elected officials on the Queens side of the Proposed Project, the NYC DOT will expand their own traffic study “to see how the state’s Belmont Park redevelopment would affect eastern Queens’ residents and address community concerns”. DOT Traffic Study Announcement

The Village has requested Nassau County Executive Laura Curran to have the Nassau County Department of Transportation to do its own full and independent traffic review to ascertain the impacts the Belmont Project will have on the residents of Nassau County. Ltr. to County Executive Curran

We are happy that Nassau County recently announced that the County DOT will expand a review of the traffic impacts of this Project in the Elmont area in response to the legitimate concerns raised by the Belmont Park Community Coalition (BPCC). LI Herald Article  We think this is a great result achieved by the BPCC. But we believe the scope of the study by the County should be expanded to analyze the impacts in all of western Nassau County, just as NYC is doing on the Queens side. Clearly, as reflected by the NCVOA Resolution, other villages in Nassau County are concerned by the detrimental impact that this Project may have. Granted, this study is something the ESD should have incorporated into their DEIS, but, unfortunately, the traffic study that underlies the DEIS has significant deficiencies as identified by the Village’s outside independent traffic consultant, NV5.

The Village has also asked the Town of Hempstead Board  Ltr to Sup. Gillen and the Nassau County Planning Commission  Ltr to Planning Commission  to exercise the jurisdiction granted to them under the Urban Development Corp. Act (“UDC Act”) to recommend either rejection or modification of the Belmont Project, as currently proposed.  The effect of a recommendation of rejection or modification will have would be to trigger a 2/3rd majority vote by the ESD Board of Directors to approve the Project ( rather than a simple majority).  Consequently, although a recommendation by the Planning Commission or the Town of Hempstead Board would not be enough to stop the Project, it would send a clear message that the municipalities impacted by the Project believe it needs to be re-thought, or, as Nassau County Presiding Officer Rich Nicolello stated at the hearings on the DEIS, this Project needs to go “back to the drawing board”.

Finally, we are glad that the ESD acted on our request and has extended the time frame in which to provide comments to the DEIS to March 1st  DEIS Extension Notice. Consequently, there is still time to submit your comments to the ESD about this Project. Please see the Village website for more information. Belmont Updates. If you do not wish to write your own letter, you can still help by signing the four form letters we have prepared regarding various problems with the Project. You can obtain copies here Belmont Form Ltrs.  and sign and drop off the letters at Village Hall.  To date we have collected over 2,000 letters from your neighbors that we have sent to elected officials and will be submitting en-masse to the ESD as part of the Village’s comments to the DEIS.

Once again our residents have responded as they have always done when Floral Park faces a challenge: we have come together and presented reasoned yet forceful analysis of proposals that can negatively impact our Village. On behalf of the Village Board, I want to thank you for rising to the challenges we face.

Dominick A Longobardi